Rank: Member
Groups: Approved
Joined: 6/17/2019(UTC) Posts: 3
Thanks: 1 times
|
I discovered this new version today and I tried it a little. The adoption of the new C # script language is very interesting, In the consumption of the cpu it seems different compared to the previous one. While the previous one constantly consumed a few tenths the new one seems to do it only at longer intervals. It's right? Memory occupancy is much larger and even boot time a bit, I think due to C #. Do you have any considerations regarding the performance comparison? ty.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration
Groups: Translators, Members, Administrators Joined: 1/11/2018(UTC) Posts: 1,359 Location: Tampa, FL Thanks: 28 times Was thanked: 419 time(s) in 356 post(s)
|
Oh yes, this version is not as fast nor small because it's C# and the .NET Framework.
It's a trade-off, in terms of the ease for me to make new features, work with a MUCH easier to use GUI and interface, plus ClearScript for .NET access, and this supports Unicode out of the box.
So I decided I would go with this. It's better that I feel motivated to actually work on this project, instead of the feeling of dread with trying to work with native WinAPI calls/UI.
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
Important Information:
The StrokesPlus.net Forum uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
More Details
Close